Skip to content

About Inner-Ground

Brief History

After several years working in Technology for Businesses and Projects, I began solving problems at Home by applying the experience gained in my professional life.

This led to publish Inner-Ground website.

If you want to know more about me, you can see my profile.

What am I trying to promote?

In simple terms:
Improving Well-being through Technology.

The message Technology for the People, in their Companies and Homes implies that:

  • Our focus is on People – on us. Okay, sometimes I contradict myself since we’re not the only creatures/living beings inhabiting the planet.
  • Along the way, there may be tools, devices, and nowadays more than ever, AI (we’ve moved from bots to agents). Remember that the ultimate beneficiaries (or “customers”) are the People.
  • Technological Problems are solved in the places where the benefit is maximized, typically in Companies/Employees and Homes/Families.
Why the Technology? It’s been one of my greatest passions for a long time. I remember the curiosity I felt as a child, reading the help section to learn Basic.

How differentiate?

Applying a set of reproducible techniques focused on achieving results at the right time (timing) and with the “best” available technology (efficient).

Put differently, strongly oriented towards the quality vs. time relationship. I share some of the “recipes”:

  • Solving very, very fast.
  • Adapting, Simplifying, and Reducing Complexity.
  • Relationship and details matter. From every word in a message to the tools used. questions?

The method

To solve very, very fast.

Incorporating Technology, prioritizing Open Source solutions, through a selection process with pre-defined acceptance criterias (*) and customizations based on the specifics of each need.

Consequently, contributing back to the Open Source communities and constantly monitoring their evolution (**).


Process details
    flowchart TD
    classDef classGreen stroke:#0f0
    classDef classRed stroke:#f00
    classDef classYellow stroke:#f96
    A[Need]:::classGreen
    B1[Tech on Open Source Community]
    B2{Meet acceptance criterias?*}
    D1[Open Source based proposal]
    D2{Solve the GAP with development?}
    E1{Development with ad-hoc or closed tech?}
    Z1([Optimal solution]):::classGreen
    Z2[Support to the community and tech following **]
    Z3([Other solution]):::classYellow
    Z4([fa:fa-ban Without solution]):::classRed

    A ao@==> |Issue/Solution Research| B1
    ao@{ animate: true }

    subgraph OpenSource
        direction TB
        B1 b1b2@==> B2
        b1b2@{ animate: true }

        B2 b2d1@==>|Si, al 100%| D1
        b2d1@{ animate: true }

        B2 b2d2@-->|Si, parcialmente| D2
        b2d2@{ animate: true }

        D2 d2d1@-->|Si| D1
        d2d1@{ animate: true }

        Z1 z1z2@==> Z2
        z1z2@{ animate: true}

        Z2 z2C@==> B1
        z2C@{ animate: true}

    end

    D2 d2d1@-->|No| Z4

    D1 e4@==>Z1
    e4@{ animate: true }

    B2 b2d2@-->|No| E1
  
    subgraph Alternativa Cerrada
        direction TB
        E1 -->|Si| Z3

    end

    E1 -->|No| Z4
  

(*) Quality of the community, strengths of the technologie, license type and much more.

(**) Donations, code contribution, new versions, vulnerabilitiers and much more.

All details soon on the Resource Center.


If you’re interested in the proposal or want to share experiences click here